| | # | Time | Name | Subject | Comment | Host | |
| 341 | 10/26 23:35 | moot | | >>340 Flagging and...>>340
Flagging and notifying by IRC is your best bet to grab the attention of a moderator.
Capchas/"vericodes" suck. We just need to clean up floods when they happen, which isn't very often. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 307 | |
| 340 | 10/26 22:01 | Xeneonic | | >>338 Point taken....>>338
Point taken.
Usually
highlighting mods on IRC that are at the PC gets a faster response
(Assuming they don't just surf the web) than flagging.
I suppose it's best to flag a board and highlight/notify a mod on IRC at the same time.
By
the way, just an insight, what about creating some sort of validation
code for each reply made (just 2 digits or something). That pretty much
would block any program from spamming replies. But ofcourse things like
these don't happen often, and users will probably dislike validating
their replies all the time. It could be considered an alternative method
of prevention. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 307 | |
| 339 | 10/26 20:05 | tsukatu | /w/ in /w... | This is obviously ...This is obviously a point of contention on /wg/.
Some
threads are blatant ("POAST ALL NARUTO WALLS!!!!!!!!"), but others go
just as smoothly as though they were on /w/, with no flames or
anything... but they're anime and work-safe. Should I delete content in
/wg/ that belongs in /w/? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Text-only thread | | |
| | | | |
| 338 | 10/26 15:51 | moot | | >>324 Almost all o...>>324
Almost
all of the moderators are EST, not PST. How is going on IRC or /j/
going to solve the problem as opposed to flagging the board if nobody is
around to begin with? I am confused. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 307 | |
| 337 | 10/26 15:49 | moot | | From the /r/ rules...From the /r/ rules: "1. All requests, be they for content or reseeds, belong here."
*Anything*
that is a request belongs in /r/. The one exception is if somebody
CONTRIBUTES while requesting. Example: "Hey anybody have more of 'x'?"
and then the user proceeds to post a few example images to get the
thread rolling. These tend to be harmless and are contributions to begin
with so I let them slide. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 332 | |
| 336 | 10/26 15:42 | moot | | I'm going to make ...I'm
going to make a post in /a/ later today (providing I remember) about
this sort of thing since some of the mods caused a ruckus with the whole
"no motivational poster/ecchi" stuff.
I've basically maintained
that as long as I don't see nipples or vagina, I really don't care.
Overtly sexual images shouldn't be posted though. If the images are
exposing but harmless in nature they should probably be left alone. It
basically worked that way without incident for a while before people
decided to try to clarify the rule. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 326 | |
| 335 | 10/26 15:40 | moot | | >>323 He's wrong. ...>>323
He's wrong. Ban request and delete. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 316 | |
| 334 | 10/26 11:35 | RyuKaiser | | I have actually as...I
have actually asked at several different times since I started where I
should draw the line for "worksafe", and have gotten several different
responses from different mods. So, when it comes to ecchi pictures that
don't have explicit penis/vagina/nipples or aren't barely censored porn,
I am most times left at a loss for what to do with the post. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 326 | |
| 333 | 10/26 08:57 | Foone | | I (as an /r/ janit...I
(as an /r/ janitor) think you should delete those posts. There's no
reason they can't request the GIFs in /r/, that's what it's for! | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 332 | |
| 332 | 10/26 07:29 | Dastardly | /gif/ boa... | The board I janito...The
board I janitor is /gif/... Quite frequently there are people /r/ing in
gif... If they /r/ about gif animated images should I delete that post?
Or should it stay? Also what about these constant traps that overload
/gif/ everyday? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Text-only thread | | |
| | | | |
| 331 | 10/26 07:04 | SSDDR | | Honestly id say ev...Honestly id say everything but >>327 would be much more at home in /e/ | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 326 | |
| 330 | 10/26 06:30 | unnes | | This was two posts...This was two posts below the post in >>329
Even
a cursory glance through /a/ will show several posts like this. The de
facto rule that I (and to my knowledge, RyuKaiser) have been working by
is "delete if it contains nipples, penis, or vagina," and use discretion
for anything else. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1161862225851.png (198.93KB) | |
| 329 | 10/26 06:24 | unnes | | Whether rightfully...Whether rightfully so or not, /a/ seems to embrace "borderline worksafe" stuff. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1161861848523.png (125.61KB) | |
| 328 | 10/26 06:14 | unnes | | Here's probably th...Here's
probably the worst of the the thread; I knew I was toeing the line on
this one. However, I remembered seeing a similar picture of a girl in
the shower with her ass exposed, and asking mods in #janiteam whether it
ought to be deleted. They seemed okay with it, so it was left
untouched. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1161861265047.jpg (171.54KB) | |
| 327 | 10/26 06:04 | unnes | | Another example fr...Another example from the thread in contention. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1161860665386.jpg (99.28KB) | |
| 326 | 10/26 05:52 | unnes | | What's the line be...What's the line between /e/ and /a/?
I've
assumed that stuff like this, while acceptable in /e/, would also be
acceptable in /a/. Yes, it's not something you'd want as your desktop on
your work computer, but then again you probably wouldn't get fired for
it like actual porn. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1161859938406.jpg (240.32KB) | |
| 325 | 10/25 21:29 | Avery-kun | | 'Sup.'Sup. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 173 | |
| 324 | 10/25 18:07 | Xeneonic | | >>315 You're right...>>315
You're
right about that, though, (Correct me if I'm wrong :)) most moderators
are PST, which occassionally ends up with no moderator currently
surveying the boards, so just flagging a board which is under attack
could take a while to be solved, thus a chance for a massive flood.
Just tell me if I'm wrong, I'm just giving you my point of view, and since I'm new I could very well be wrong. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 307 | |
| 323 | 10/25 16:15 | l3reak | | >>317 So, we shoul...>>317
So,
we should escalate on this type of material instead of ban requesting,
even though with escalation the material remains on the board? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 316 | |
| 322 | 10/25 15:07 | RyuKaiser | | >>321 That might h...>>321
That might have actually been why. I didn't realize I was looking at mainly large threads at the time. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 215 | |
| 321 | 10/25 12:52 | damageinc | | >>320 was that on ...>>320
was
that on a long thread? if so, then its not a bug, it doesn't add
buttons to long threads becaues its slow. big stckies on /b/ can take
minuets to parse, so I disable it and make them just appear on mouse
over.
>>319
I've had a few janitors mention this, I'll look into it. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 215 | |
| 320 | 10/25 11:43 | RyuKaiser | | This is hardly a s...This
is hardly a serious bug, or even a source of any great annoyance, but I
thought I should mention it here, anyway. It seems that when I go into
reply mode in a thread, none of the extension's buttons load, as you can
see in the attached screenshot.
They will load for a particular
post when I move the mouse over it, though, which is why a few of the
posts in the screenshot have them but the rest don't.
Again, nothing serious, but I found it curious. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1161794587629.png (36.57KB) | |
| 319 | 10/25 08:52 | mynamejt | | The extension func...The
extension functions, like the left-click image viewing, and the [+] to
view an entire thread works on some boards (/v/,/h/,/j/), but not others
(/b/,/tv/). | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 215 | |
| 318 | 10/25 04:06 | Kobra | | Will do. It's the ...Will do. It's the second time, so I'll go on a 3 strikes rule from here on out. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 316 | |
| 317 | 10/25 03:37 | tripon | | >>316 delete, and...>>316
delete, and yes, escalate if they keep on posting it. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 316 | |
| 316 | 10/25 03:27 | Kobra | | Recently people ha...Recently people have been posting images of 16ish girls in ridiculously short volleyball shorts in /sp/.
I've
been removing the images because it's basically Jailbait, but I wanted
to know if I should just go ahead and request a ban right off the bat if
it happens again? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Text-only thread | | |
| | | | |
| 315 | 10/24 20:53 | moot | | >>313 Or you know,...>>313
Or you know, you could just, flag the board for review (which is how we actually learned of the problem to begin with)! | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 307 | |
| 314 | 10/24 20:39 | Troubadour | Overt Pro... | What should the po...What
should the policy in /n/ be about sites such as Newsmax, TruthOut, and
InformationClearingHouse? Sometimes these sites appear and largely cause
flamewars. Should there be a rule against them when rules are drafted,
and in the meantime, what should policy be? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1161740352385.jpg (67.21KB) | |
| 313 | 10/24 18:02 | Xeneonic | | Just an update, se...Just
an update, seems like the old /g/ attacks have been solved, users could
go to a certain website which would then flood the /g/ board under the
normal user's IP address.
Ofcourse it's still good to let the
mods and/or managers know about any form of attacks, posting here, and
more efficiently, on the IRC Channel. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 307 | |
| 312 | 10/24 17:42 | alternati... | | >>310 because when...>>310
because when you go to the website, it forces your IP to flood /g/ with DESU DESU etc | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 307 | |