| | # | Time | Name | Subject | Comment | Host | |
| 697 | 01/17 22:47 | Dr. Stein | | Heh, me again. I w...Heh,
me again. I will be in Washington DC until Saturday evening without my
laptop. Just keeping you informed so I don't get blamed if somebody
spams /c/ with CP or something. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 458 | |
| 696 | 01/17 19:19 | NiGHTS | | Now that /cgl/ has...Now
that /cgl/ has rules in place, I am now begining to request bans for
posting threads that cause drama. Of course since posting any picture of
Adella, Francesca Dani or RikkuX immediately causes a rush of posts of
flames, nudes and people defending the cosplayer, I've been deleting the
threads almost as soon as I see them. Of course this causes the user
base to flip out and now claim that "Francesca is having secks with the
mods."
Fellow Janitors and mods, I'd really appreciate some
advice on how to deal with this situation. I can't prevent discussion on
these cosplayers however I don't want them to get out of hand and ruin
the spirit of what the rules of /cgl/ is trying to create. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1169079592717.jpg (50.85KB) | |
| 695 | 01/17 17:27 | Danbo Dax... | | >>693 Still doesn...>>693
Still
doesn't seem to work. It doesn't say anything like Invalid Password, it
just doesn't do anything at all once I click Delete. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 681 | |
| 694 | 01/17 16:54 | dis.astra... | | /m/ seems to devel.../m/
seems to developed a new infestation of sage bombers and thread
shitters lately, on top of the usual "but /r/ is for porn" crowd. It
seems like the only time any one uses the report system is when they
think it'll fight their worthless flame wars for them. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 693 | 01/17 16:44 | damageinc | | >>691 I thought I ...>>691
I thought I had fixed that, but looking at the code I hadn't. Try this:
http://4chan.wrathfilledhate.net/nojanitormenuhere/4chan_janitor.v###.###.###.###.xpi
admin version on the wiki. There's version for firefox 1.0+ and a version for firefox 2.0+. The 2.0+ has a ban template feature,
since
I'm here: I'm pretty much re-writing the extension because its a mess
and ill conceived. I haven't fully decided, but I think that this
version will require firefox 2.0. I will however keep the current
version of the extension working in at least 1.5+, just probably with
out many new features. If anyone has any comments I will listen. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 681 | |
| 692 | 01/17 07:52 | Danbo Dax... | | There's been more ...There's
been more and more furry flashes being posted lately, and I've decided
that I'm not going easy on people anymore, I'm just straight up
requesting bans for anything furry. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 691 | 01/17 07:50 | Danbo Dax... | | This seems as good...This
seems as good a place as any to mention it, but the extension is still
broken for /f/. I can still use the Password box to delete stuff, but
the buttons to the side of posts don't seem to function.
I'm still able to do things, it's just a bit of a hassle and I figure you probably want this fixed. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 681 | |
| 690 | 01/16 22:34 | Troubadour | | The Myst books wer...The Myst books were a pretty imaginative concept. That rocketship sucked though.
Tone-deaf + Music Puzzle = NO. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 669 | |
| 689 | 01/16 19:30 | youth | | not furry. do NOT ...not
furry. do NOT make ban requests for this and simply label them 'furry,'
i will be honest in saying i hardly ever check the validity of a
janitor's ban request and always ban for furry. midna is awesome. she's
not an animal-derived humanoid, nor does she have fur. she's just a
weird colored/shaped humanoid, and a cute one at that. i understand that
probably the only places on 4chan she fits are /b/ and /d/, but she's
not furry. thanks. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 684 | |
| 688 | 01/16 03:23 | Trantez | | furryfurry | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 684 | |
| 687 | 01/15 14:44 | Zorpheus | | I've only seen one...I've only seen one picture of her that was both mature and human-like... Everything else, IMO, belongs in /d/, if anywhere. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 684 | |
| 686 | 01/14 21:37 | Quote | | this has been brou...this
has been brought up a few times in /r/, usually ending in flames. i
might be able to buy the anti-furry argument ("creature of shadow" they
say. whatever), but every hentai pic i see of her in that first form
just screams loli. and judging from the flame posts i read before i
nuke the thread, most of /r/ agrees with me. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 684 | |
| 685 | 01/14 21:15 | kami | | I don't get the po...I don't get the pop up ads... I don't have adblock or any of those things. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 663 | |
| 684 | 01/14 20:14 | Dhomochev... | Midna in ... | Lately, there have...Lately,
there have been a lot of posts (usually requests, tbh) for pics of
Midna from Twilight Princess over on /h/, and almost always with this
image (second result on GIS if you're interested). These always erupt
into arguments of is she/isn't she furry. Those who claim she isn't say
that she's no different from a catgirl or a Mithra from FFXI, just that
she looks a little weirder. I've been deleting them because they're
either requests or flamebait, but I was wondering what the rest of you
thought, or if I could get an official ruling on the matter. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1168823662997.jpg (69.32KB) | |
| 683 | 01/14 20:03 | Dhomochev... | | I'm not a doctor -...I'm not a doctor - though I do play one on tv. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 669 | |
| 682 | 01/14 19:50 | NiGHTS | | Working fine for m...Working fine for me as well. I am quite happy about the way you check reports now, much better then the separate screen. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 663 | |
| 681 | 01/14 19:47 | damageinc | Firefox E... | http://4chan.wrath...http://4chan.wrathfilledhate.net/nojanitormenuhere/4chan_janitor.v###.###.###.###.xpi
If you were using janitor version ###.###.###.###-rc5 or the admin version ###.###.###.###-rc4 then you don't need to update.
link to the admin version is on the wiki.
bugs/problems/requests/etc post here. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Text-only thread | | |
| | | | |
| 680 | 01/14 19:41 | damageinc | | right, thanks. tha...right, thanks. that should be enough. I'll release it now. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 663 | |
| 679 | 01/14 19:24 | Kobra | | So far so good, no...So far so good, no problems to report on my end. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 663 | |
| 678 | 01/14 19:11 | Dr. Stein | | I have "Dr." in my...I have "Dr." in my name, can I write myself a note? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 669 | |
| 677 | 01/14 18:47 | Zorpheus | | I've got a doctor'...I've got a doctor's note. Can I be excused? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 669 | |
| 676 | 01/14 18:38 | AT_DA | | Works for me alrig...Works for me alright so far. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 663 | |
| 675 | 01/14 18:29 | Bachus | | >>674 Ditto. Has ...>>674
Ditto. Has worked fine for me. Seen the ad in a new tab twice on two different computers. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 663 | |
| 674 | 01/14 18:26 | Quote | | would have posted ...would have posted earlier but there was a bug :(
works
fine for me. clicking thumbnails opens the ad in a new tab and expands
the image in the original tab. after that the images expand normally
and i haven't seen the ad more than once a day. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 663 | |
| 673 | 01/14 18:18 | Katsu | | this is a quiz.this is a quiz. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 669 | |
| 672 | 01/14 17:59 | damageinc | | this is not a testthis is not a test | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 669 | |
| 671 | 01/14 17:56 | damageinc | | >>670 I need to kn...>>670
I need to know that it works for at least a few people, otherwise im screwing the site out of money. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 663 | |
| 670 | 01/14 17:31 | Anonymous | | Huh? I told you ye...Huh?
I told you yesterday on IRC that the ads work and you said oh good.
I've not had any strange errors or anything either, so everything seems
to be in order. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 663 | |
| 669 | 01/14 16:41 | alternati... | | this is a testthis is a test | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1168810880161.jpg (122.74KB) | |
| 668 | 01/14 15:58 | damageinc | | I'd like to take t...I'd like to take this silence as nothing is wrong, but I can't since I need to know if the ads are showing every 24 hours.
Could
those of you who are using this version of the extension post saying
weather you've seen the ads or not (in a separate tab). I can't release
this version until I know that its working properly. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 663 | |