| | # | Time | Name | Subject | Comment | Host | |
| 865 | 03/25 21:32 | moot | | Well it violates r...Well
it violates rule #4, as you said, but I guess in some cases it could be
bent without doing much harm. Just use your own discretion. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 860 | |
| 864 | 03/25 07:18 | DamageInc | | >>863 as you said,...>>863
as
you said, allowing NWS content would just make it a porn board, people
would just post porn of their favorite game characters, becoming Hentai -
Game or something.
I think making /v/ NWS would just make it worse. I think it just needs about twice as many janitors as other boards. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 863 | 03/24 16:59 | geckoagua | | I know /v/ is clas...I know /v/ is classified worksafe, but has there ever been any consideration into adding a NSFW tag?
I
don't know the reasoning /behind/ making it worksafe, so I don't know
if it's SFW for the sake of people who could browse at work, or the
ideal that allowing NSFW images would just turn /v/ into a
game-related-/h/. But I do know that there are users who actually try
post borderline or blatant NSFW images that are actually relevant to the
topic at hand (in fact, a staggering amount of video-game related
official and tasteful fan art is considered NSFW). Lots also use the
spoiler tag to try to keep it SFW, which only really makes it worse, but
whatever.
The problems;
1.) It won't stop people from posting guro porn on the boards to stir shit up.
2.)
It might result in said people using it to hide guro porn, but
ironically people are much faster in reporting illegal use of a spoiler
tag to hide porn, than they are un-spoilered porn in another thread.
Benefits;
1.)
A compromise with the userbase that keeps work users and private users
happy. This also means less people going on 'revenge' crusades because
you deleted their NSFW picture they hid under a spoiler tag for the
benefit of people at work.
2.) Less shittons of reports for topic-relevant hentai.
3.)
Removes the morbid fascination of the userbase to /endlessly/ post
borderline images to test janitors or be dicks, shit, I don't know why.
At least it's an idea? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 862 | 03/23 20:32 | Quote | | i am on spring bre...i
am on spring break and will be leaving for las vegas tomorrow
afternoon. i will be gone until wednesday or thursday. keep an eye on
/r/ and /t/ for me! | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 458 | |
| 861 | 03/23 10:06 | kanria | | carpal tunnel suck...carpal tunnel sucks.
i will be able to manage checking reports a few times but other than that, i won't be as active.
sry | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 458 | |
| 860 | 03/23 04:05 | Foone | Single so... | I've seen a bunch ...I've
seen a bunch of threads in /r/ where single songs are requested, and
I'm wondering is that an exception to the standard licensing rules?
like, requesting The Beatles - Abbey Road = NO
requesting The Beatles - Here Comes the Sun = OK? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1174637132102.jpg (65.05KB) | |
| 858 | 03/22 09:32 | SSDDR | | ah, sorry, i was j...ah,
sorry, i was just trying to follow the rules to the letter, but i see
your point. I think most of those i filed had unrelated/non /h/ pics,
but i will be sure to specify in the future. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 857 | 03/22 03:44 | tsukatu | | >>819 The morons o...>>819
The
morons on /w/ have gone for a while without being overseen, apparently,
and now they're flipping out when I delete NSFW content.
Somehow, that sentiment has spread into /a/. I do not janitor /a/, so I have no details about this. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 855 | 03/21 20:03 | Zorpheus | | My usual system fo...My usual system for requests in /h/ is:
If the first picture isn't /h/, then I request a ban. This includes doujin covers.
If
the first picture at least contains a related nude picture, or is
/h/-worthy but not related to their request, the thread is merely
deleted.
If the first picture is /h/-worthy and related, I usually leave it alone except in special cases. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 852 | 03/21 16:25 | DamageInc | | Why discorage cont...Why
discorage contribution? (relevent) contribution buys you the right to
ask something (related, and in keeping with the board) of the board. As
long as the contribution is of quality then it is adding to the board
and there is no problem. /r/ is for shitty requests that probably won;t
get answered anyway. It was only made to keep requests out of /t/
anyway. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 851 | 03/21 14:23 | l3reak | | >>850 Plus, you ha...>>850
Plus, you have the whole slippery slope of "where does it become a request, and where is it just a themed thread"
first post: "Here, I'll post a bunch of rei-chan pics in this thread"
first post: "This is a rei-chan thread!"
first post: "rei-chan itt"
first post: "this is my best rei-chan pic. what are your favorites, /h/?"
first post: "everybody post your favorite rei-chan pics!"
first post: "let's post rei-chan pics"
first post: "post rei-chan in this thread"
first post: "give me all of your rei-chan pics"
I
mean, which ones of these are too "request"-ish? I think themed
threads are great and well enjoyed by boards, even when they may tread
over towards /r/ territory.
Honestly, when you post an evangelion
picture and say "evangelion is awesome", there's an implicit request
there, and people will post more eva in the thread - does the exact
wording really matter? Isn't that just being anal? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 850 | 03/21 14:10 | tripon | | >>849 Don't be re...>>849
Don't
be retarded. you're not going to stop people from requesting in /h/.
(or on any other board for that matter.) But people still use /r/ for
what it is. Just don't delete requests unless the image they use is off
topic, the request is off topic, or the request they asked for is
derided. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 849 | 03/21 06:49 | Foone | | >>848 If you let p...>>848
If you let people do /h/ requests in /h/ instead of /r/, people will stop making them in /r/
People who answer /r/ requests will no longer see them, since they'll never appear in the board.
It unnecessarily fragments the requests across multiple boards.
And
I think they will disrupt /h/. /r/ threads that don't get answered get
bumped a lot, without content. This isn't a big problem on /r/ because
half the threads there are like that.
On /h/ though you've got
threads with content and threads that are being bumped without content,
and the bumped useless ones will win. "bump" is easier to post than a
doujin page. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 848 | 03/21 06:44 | ALTERNATI... | | >>847 /r/ is still...>>847
/r/
is still useful and I don't believe these type of posts harm /r/ to any
extent. The point is that deleting these kind of posts would be too
harsh an execution of the rules. It's not harming the board and people
arent normally getting upset so it isn't a problem. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 847 | 03/21 06:39 | Foone | | Then what the fuck...Then what the fuck is the point of having an /r/, then?
It may not disrupt /h/, but it'll sure disrupt /r/ | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 846 | 03/21 06:35 | ALTERNATI... | | >>845 because it i...>>845
because it isnt annoying and it doesnt disrupt the board | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 845 | 03/21 06:21 | Foone | | >>844 But WHY allo...>>844
But WHY allow it, that's what I'm asking. This is exactly the thing /r/ does: Answer requests for shit, often /h/ shit. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 844 | 03/21 06:17 | ALTERNATI... | | If they post a rel...If
they post a relevent porn picture then it's fine. Examples of this
happening are when someone posts one or a few of a doujin and asks for
the source or me.
If the image is not related and/or porn, delete it. Otherwise, it's not a problem. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 843 | 03/21 05:59 | Foone | | Why? Isn't this ex...Why?
Isn't this exactly why we have an /r/? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 842 | |
| 842 | 03/21 05:51 | zephro | To SSDDR ... | Hay. It's okay to ...Hay.
It's okay to request in /h/ as long as the initial picture is /h/ in content, and related.
As
a result, I shall be clearing all of your ban requests, since I have no
idea of telling whether the pictures are related or not.
Ask Zorpheus on how to make a proper /h/ ban req. That's all! | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Text-only thread | | |
| | | | |
| 840 | 03/15 17:03 | Alex | | this is to inform ...this is to inform you that i wont be able to take care of /s for 9 days, starting today | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 458 | |
| 838 | 03/13 10:41 | kanria | massive f... | I LEAVE MY SEAT TO...I LEAVE MY SEAT TO GET A SHOWER AND THIS HAPPENS.
on all 5 pages of /u/
board's been flagged.
uhghghhg | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1173796912251.gif (80.78KB) | |
| 837 | 03/13 03:23 | SamuraiXm... | | IMMA GOIN' TO VISI...IMMA GOIN' TO VISIT MAH GRANDPAAAAAAA!
Seriously
though, I'll be on and off until about April 1 (mostly "off" in the
last week), so if someone can hold down /e/ for me, thanks. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 458 | |
| 836 | 03/12 04:35 | l3reak | | >>833 roger that >...>>833
roger that
>>826
Yeah,
if it's a general request for, say, "post some daffy duck pictures" and
they post a picture themselves, I've viewed that as fine & dandy.
I do delete & ban request on any sort of "post the newest issue of 'batman beats up the joker' please" or whatever, though. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 825 | |
| 834 | 03/11 18:36 | RyuKaiser | | I am on spring bre...I
am on spring break now, and will be going to Tahoe tomorrow until
Saturday. I don't know how much internet access I will have while there,
so I'll probably be unable to watch over /a/ for most of the week. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 458 | |
| 833 | 03/11 00:07 | moot | | >>832 Actually I s...>>832
Actually I said RapidShare/MegaUpload threads were alright (so long as I'm not getting complaints).
If
there is one large request thread running at any given time, it's not a
big deal. Just make sure there aren't ten different ones all requesting
different things--keep it in one place. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 825 | |
| 832 | 03/08 19:26 | alternati... | | if you see license...if you see licensed material being posted, delete and ban request | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 825 | |
| 831 | 03/08 19:24 | alternati... | | if the video being...if the video being linked to is in no way related to television, delete it. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 830 | |
| 830 | 03/08 12:24 | rokoo | | For the past month...For
the past month now I've been seeing an increase in threads with links
to youtube. Sometimes these threads link to movie related stuff like
behind the scenes footage, interviews etc. But now and then its some fat
kid and his friends with a camera.
They range from parodies to
amateur films made by college students. I delete most of these threads
but sometimes they look for feedback, which is okay i guess as it is
film related but they have youtube for that.
So what do I delete all threads that contain links to youtube or just the ones made be amateur directors? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1173374682157.png (167.2KB) | |
| 829 | 03/08 10:57 | NiGHTS | | I will be gone Mar...I will be gone March 13th and 14th as I will be in Lake Louise. Please look after /cgl/ for me. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 458 | |