| | # | Time | Name | Subject | Comment | Host | |
| 927 | 05/11 17:12 | geckoagua | | geckoagua from /v/...geckoagua
from /v/ and /x/ here, I'm heading to England for 8 days, I'm bringing
my laptop and hopefully will find enough intermittent hotspots to check
around, but something tells me ye olde country bread and breakfast has
not yet adopted telephonograph technology. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 458 | |
| 926 | 05/11 16:46 | Kobra | | I think promoting ...I
think promoting a few more janitors who are constantly in the IRC
channel and available throughout the day would be a better option and a
lot less work. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 917 | |
| 925 | 05/11 15:39 | Foone | | >>922 Then these p...>>922
Then
these people should not BE janitors. Or at least they should probably
be explained the right way to do it, and if they continue doing it wrong
they should not be janitors.
That's why a 1 hour tempban might
be a good idea. It lets us stop the idiots from posting CP or whatever,
and if we were wrong, the mods (whenever they show up) can remove it (or
let it expire). If a janitor is doing a lot of 1 hour bans that were
over-banning, that should be very obvious.
They don't even have to be full bans, what >>920
suggested would work perfectly fine, I think.
Maybe
add a way for janitors to get feedback on their bans? Like have a page
where they can see the banrequests that were not accepeted. Right now I
don't know if I'm underrequesting or overrequesting unless a mod yells
at me on IRC.
(Only really useful in combination with giving janitors
more banning power, but would still be nice to have otherwise. Again,
I'd be glad to help code this stuff) | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 917 | |
| 924 | 05/11 14:24 | Lana | | >>923 I think the ...>>923
I
think the only new system I'd want is the banding together to ban or
delete. I am all for getting CP posters banned immediately, and I'd love
to be able to delete shit on other boards if those janitors aren't
around. It seems too stupid to sit there and stare at rule
breaking/illegal posts on someone else's board and know you can't do
anything about it (as this last week or so has shown.)
Anything else sounds like a hassle that would only end up pissing off everyone. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 917 | |
| 923 | 05/11 14:20 | Anonymous | | >>922 That's why i...>>922
That's
why it would only stop them from posting, not from browsing. If
something doesn't deserve a ban they shouldn't ban request anyway, and
I'm sure the mods will yell at them for it if they spam pointless ban
requests, so the benefits would far outweigh any inconvenience. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 917 | |
| 922 | 05/11 14:08 | Kobra | | You're forgetting ...You're forgetting a lot of janitors are way too ban-happy and that would cause a lot of inconvenience for the users. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 917 | |
| 921 | 05/11 13:53 | Dhomochev... | | >>920 Interesting...>>920
Interesting
idea. Not sure if it would entirely work, since I've seen so many
'lolz I evaded ur ban' threads, but it would give us some kind of
breathing room, especially since I'm sure most of us have to deal with
repeat offenders on our boards. Maybe an extra 'suspend posting
privilages' button in the case of spammers and the like? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 917 | |
| 920 | 05/11 13:24 | Anonymous | | That would be nice...That
would be nice, floods are annoying as hell and they can go on for hours
at a time. Perhaps making it so that when a janitor ban requests
someone, that IP can no longer post until a moderator processes the ban
request, but he would still able to browse the site in the meantime. To
me that is preferable to us being able to give out actual temp bans
because it isn't really a punishment but it would keep them from posting
crap until a mod either clears it or bans him. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 917 | |
| 919 | 05/11 12:46 | Kobra | | Agreed, simply ban...Agreed,
simply ban requesting doesn't stop them from posting whatever they want
until a moderator gets to the ban request, especially a time of the day
when there's no moderators on at all. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 917 | |
| 918 | 05/11 12:19 | Lana | | Second. I feel lik...Second.
I feel like we're constantly being yelled at to be in IRC, yet I've
been able to actually contact a mod in there maybe twice in the last few
weeks, when I feel like I've been in there trying to find one almost
every day. It's really frustrating to see people come back after we ban
request them, and to see shit go untouched on boards we don't janitor.
I've posted links to a couple threads on other boards that have lasted
hours without anyone in IRC doing anything :(
I can't code and I
really shouldn't say anything about THAT ANONYMOUS JANITOR ABOVE ME and
what he can or can't do, but I agree with his options there 100%. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 917 | |
| 917 | 05/11 11:33 | Foone | mods,... | This has been happ...This has been happening with increasing regularity over the last week:
1. Idiot spams board
2. Janitors ban request him
3. Janitors say on IRC "any mods around? Someone is spamming"
4. idiot continues to spam while janitors try to delete all the posts
One
idiot yesterday spammed every single board THREE TIMES before he was
banned. Someone was just doing with child porn it on /b/, posted at
least 4 pictures (and I still don't think he's banned)
Can you please, PLEASE either
1. Promote some janitors to mods
2.
Give janitors some way to ban people, at least temporarily (say one
hour). Before I left I remember some mention of a system where multiple
janitors could ban someone by "combining their power", maybe that should
be implemented? (I'm willing to code it!)
3. GET ON IRC A LITTLE MORE OFTEN PLEASE
The
spam on our boards is bad enough but when people can post insanely
illegal child porn many many times in a row it's really really bad.
Hey, my report icon just went red... | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1178897601552.jpg (70.06KB) | |
| 916 | 05/11 11:18 | Dhomochev... | | Over the last week...Over
the last week or so, there have been a massive influx of posts and
requests for hentai of the series Lucky Star. These threads are always
filled with loli. I'm not sure if it's the same person or what, because
they always seem to start with the same image, and most of the same
pics in each thread. I've been deleting and reporting, but they pop
back up within a few hours. Suggestions, anyone? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 915 | 05/11 01:17 | ALTERNATI... | | Abuse of the repor...Abuse of the reports system is bannable. That said, flooding a thread with unrelated pictures is both annoying and bannable.
if you see people reporting things over and over that are obviously not against the rules then please let a mod know | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 914 | 05/10 22:01 | RyuKaiser | | >>910 I actually a...>>910
I actually asked coda about this the other day and he said flooding a topic with unrelated images IS a bannable offense. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 913 | 05/10 21:19 | ALTERNATI... | | >>912 That's fine.>>912
That's fine. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 908 | |
| 912 | 05/10 15:29 | kami | | >>908 hmm... is "...>>908
hmm... is "posting porn" alright or do you need me to elaborate? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 908 | |
| 911 | 05/10 15:27 | kami | | >>910 Yeah those ...>>910
Yeah
those are pretty annoying. I think alt said something about reporting
them to anonymous but he didn't specify as to whether we should
delete/ban request or clear it.
soooo
¯\(º_o)/¯ | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 910 | 05/10 14:40 | Trantez | | So, I enjoy gettin...So,
I enjoy getting a report for every god damn picture of touhou. Oh how
so much I enjoy them! So, why should I complain about getting 10-20 a
day?
How should we respond to this mod team? Is this report function
abuse? Because unless it's a deletable offense to put pictures of
something else than the topic into a thread. We don't have many threads
that will exist on /a/. But the reports keep coming in about it.
Guidance needed! | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1178822411092.jpg (63.24KB) | |
| 908 | 05/10 14:07 | Tripon | | When making ban re...When
making ban requests. PLEASE BE AS DESCRIPTIVE AS POSSIBLE. I'll be
frank, I will just clear your ban request if you write 'lol drama' in
your damn ban request. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Text-only thread | | |
| | | | |
| 907 | 05/10 12:47 | Lana | | I'm heading up to ...I'm
heading up to northern Pennsylvania for a field camp/class on the 12th.
I should be getting my laptop back pretty soon after I get there, but
I'm going to be busy as hell until I get home around June 4th, so I
won't be a very reliable janitor until then. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 458 | |
| 906 | 05/09 23:02 | moot | | >>905 Fixed.>>905
Fixed. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 905 | 05/09 21:50 | Mac | | Also, people are g...Also,
people are getting really annoyed about the erratic and non-bumping
threads in /i/. A number of the regulars have stated they're discouraged
from drawing anymore because of it. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 904 | 05/08 09:35 | Mac | | There seem to be a...There
seem to be a spate of people at the moment who are posting non-oekaki
works in /i/. I'll usually delete stuff like image macros and sometimes
let other stuff slide if it is in some way relevant to the thread, but
specifically there are a growing number of paintchat threads. They're
vaguely related to oekaki, and they seem popular, but the screencaps
posted are pretty huge and nothing much of worth, so not sure whether
these should be deleted. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 512 | |
| 903 | 05/04 12:28 | Zephro | | >>902 Har, thanks....>>902
Har, thanks.
Anyway, I fixed it thanks to a suggestion from Anon. Deleted the 4000+ post unstickied Pokeman thread. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 899 | |
| 902 | 05/04 11:39 | Kobra | | >>900 Maybe the u...>>900
Maybe the users were deleting the pictures?
(nice background btw) | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 899 | |
| 901 | 05/04 09:21 | Foone | | That was happening...That was happening somewhat randomly to /?/ threads a while back. Maybe a bug? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 899 | |
| 900 | 05/04 09:16 | Zephro | | Something like thi...Something like this, x50 | ###.###.###.### | |
| | File (KB) | |
| | 1178284584718.jpg (240.72KB) | |
| 899 | 05/04 06:56 | Zephro | /v/ pictu... | Okay, who's deleti...Okay, who's deleting all the pictures of threads in /v/? | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Text-only thread | | |
| | | | |
| 898 | 04/25 20:33 | Anonymous | | Quite awhile ago t...Quite
awhile ago there was a large poll thread on one of my boards with
questions like age, sex, likes, dislikes, etc. and I asked a mod in IRC
if this rule is enforced and he said it most certainly is. Don't request
bans for it though, ask a mod to take a look at it and if he feels
there is enough evidence and that the person isn't joking he'll take
care of it. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 895 | |
| 897 | 04/25 20:22 | Dr. Stein | | Alright. Thanks fo...Alright. Thanks for clearing that up. | ###.###.###.### | |
| | Reply to thread | |
| | 895 | |