#	Time	Name	Subject	Comment	Host
	962	05/22 22:27	l3reak		Seems like deletin...Seems like deleting it now would be a good policy, since /tg/ is new (and I'm assuming that's what you're talking about). The users aren't used to being able to post them yet, so they won't revolt if it's deleted. Hopefully. Any input from the higher-ups?	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		961
	961	05/22 16:09	Troubadour	/tg/ and ...	While I certainly ...While I certainly understand not wanting to shred fifty bux on a new rule book or something of the sort, what should the policy be on rapidshare dumps of these? Seems a bit off for a worksafe board, certainly, and is copyrighted material in the US and Europe, at least, unlike certain Japanese content. Right now I delete these dumps or request for dump threads since they are illegal. It's more widespread now, so any input on this?	###.###.###.###
		File (KB)
		1179864582993.jpg (156.44KB)
	960	05/21 14:05	Kobra		Have coda autoban ...Have coda autoban him.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		959
	959	05/21 13:15	l3reak	/tg/ prob...	Alright, /tg/ seem...Alright, /tg/ seems to have a very persistant troll. Normally I'd bring this up on IRC, but I can't get on until tomorrow or so. He posts either the same 3 or 4 sfw TransGender (i.e. he wants TG to stand for that) pics of Evangelion characters or another 3 or 4 Tails from Sonic transgender furry porn pics. I think he's the same guy posting yuri there occasionally, too. Thing is, I delete his picture and make ban requests, but he's been doing it persistantly for about 4 or 5 days now. There are a couple ban requests in for him right now. Lately he's going into /co/ occasionally with the tails pics, too. Help?	###.###.###.###
		File (KB)
		1179767704722.jpg (286.91KB)
	954	05/19 07:20	ryukaiser		>>953 people who m...>>953 people who matter can see your name, and everyone can see your boards.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		458
	953	05/19 07:14	Trantez		INTERNET MAINTENAN...INTERNET MAINTENANCE. Will be back at an indefinate time. ... And does even help if I mention this? All of our names are Anonymous. Then again, blah blah admin probably can see it.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		458
	952	05/18 16:28	Foone		>>948 sorry, forgo...>>948 sorry, forgot to mention this was on /r/ Blatant requests are what we do :)	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		947
	951	05/17 23:57	foto		>>939 possibly che...>>939 possibly check boxes within each thread and mass delete at the top where the OP is?	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917
	950	05/17 22:28	Dr. Stein		>>949 Thanks for t...>>949 Thanks for that. I'd imagine that "shit sux, amirite guys" posts should go, while "This is what I like, what else could you suggest?" would be ok.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		946
	949	05/17 22:12	pixel		Consider Global Ru...Consider Global Rule #6 "The quality of posts is extremely important to this community. Contributors are encouraged to provide high-quality images and informative comments." under this it says that quality is important, so what is this user posting a screenie of his folders doing? if does not serve a purpose and or the user could have found a more comprehensive and relevent pic, why did they even post it? you should also consider /mu/ rule #2 "Trolling, instigating, or participating in a flamewar will result in a ban." what is the user trying to incite? insightful conversation or a shitty thread? please consider these when making your judgement. it is a very case by case basis	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		946
	948	05/17 22:07	pixel		you should... reas...you should... reason being it is a blatent request no one answers them because its a big waste of space if they return to spam it... please engage a ban request for spamming X number of times for request for help with homework	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		947
	947	05/17 21:35	Foone	Homework ...	Can I delete these...Can I delete these? They're off-topic, they never get answered, and they're often for homework that's obviously highschool-aged or younger.	###.###.###.###
		File (KB)
		1179452137201.jpg (50.85KB)
	946	05/16 17:18	Dr. Stein	A questio...	A while ago there ...A while ago there was a thread where a moderator banned a user for posting a screencap of his music files, claiming that it was pointless attention whoring. Since then, it has kind of been an unwritten rule that screencaps of collections are not allowed to be posted. However, some of them are popping up again and they are being reported. What is the offical ruling on what to do with them?	###.###.###.###
		File (KB)
		1179350326567.jpg (22.44KB)
	945	05/15 17:35	l3reak		>>870 In a similar...>>870 In a similar vein, should I delete "post that in /r/" posts like 880015 here, since they're basically the source of this sort of problem? They are pretty much requests, too, which shouldn't be outside of /r/ too much anyway.	###.###.###.###
		File (KB)
		1179264955164.jpg (64.16KB)
	944	05/15 10:34	Bachus		There'd be some ab...There'd be some abuse, but I think it could be at least a little helpful. If a user is helpful enough to actually report an offending pic/post surely they'd be helpful enough to type a couple words? Or has janitoring not shattered what little innocence I have remaining?	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		940
	943	05/14 05:10	Tsukatu		I'm putting one of...I'm putting one of my computers in storage and taking the other home with me. I'll be out of commission from today (the 14th) through the 16th, and possibly through the 17th. I watch /w/ and /wg/. /w/ hardly ever has any problems, but the number of reports per day on /wg/ has been steadily increasing. If someone could view reports a few times a day, that would probably be sufficient.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		458
	942	05/13 23:27	AT_DA		I've thought about...I've thought about this too. Generally I can figure it out by a ton of flame posts in a non-reported but violating thread, or have no idea on currently reported threads. So those who did utilize it would probably just be morons anyhow.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		940
	941	05/13 21:37	Quote		i agree that this ...i agree that this would be helpful, but considering (at least in my experience) how infrequently the report system is utilized by the end users, i'm not sure if they'd even bother.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		940
	940	05/13 20:58	Dr. Stein	Report su...	I know that the te...I know that the team is already working on things, so this suggestion may be coming at a bad time, but I figured that I'd just throw it out there before I forgot about it myself. Would it be possible to make a "reason" field in the report window, so that the average user can sort of explain the situation in addition to just reporting it? It wouldn't have to be mandatory to report something, but would just be there for any extra helpful information that may be needed to explain the situation, such as "This guy has been spamming this image in a bunch of threads". The hypothetical image could be worksafe, and if it was simply reported, the janitor wouldn't know why. An attached user comment would explain things. There isn't an urgent need for this (for me at least), but I think that it may be helpful. Your thoughts.	###.###.###.###
		File (KB)
		1179104303239.png (4.33KB)
	939	05/13 10:39	Trantez		What are you talki...What are you talking about Anonymous? I enjoy playing ban request and delete. Can't keep 4chan clean all the time. What would be nice... is a better way to view the entire board, like a janitor view. Like today, almost 100ish posts with "DESUx70" and "GO BACK TO BED HAL". No problems manually deleting, but mass deletion wouldn't be so bad I think. /a/ is hit pretty hard with the wave of shit. Hope these new tools you speak of don't suck.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917
	938	05/12 23:06	Troubadour		>>937 I agree with...>>937 I agree with that. On my board, there's a troll who basically bashes everything and goes against at least two of the global/board rules in a post. (Generally mixing /b/tardism rules and 'strong opinion tossing' rules) I'm not sure how easy or hard it is to ban him (proxies and all that), but I think I've asked for a ban on him before and he's definitely a repeat offender. Sometimes every post he makes in a thread has to be deleted because of "kike hate" or claims that one side or the other are "christfags" or "niggerlovers" or some such.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917
	937	05/12 02:11	Foone		>>936 Right. I del...>>936 Right. I delete stuff all the time, I have no problem with that, I understand that's my job. I'm not complaining about that at all. I'm complaining about things where the only reason we have to delete it at all is because the ban requests are not getting answered, where we have already escalated it to the point of ban requesting. There's nothing we can do at that point but sit there deleting their reposts and hoping the moderators wake up. Suggestion #2 (give janitors more powers) was just intended as an alternate solution to the "ban requests are not getting handled" problem. The problem is not that janitors don't have enough power, it's that people who need bans are not getting them. I don't care how that problem is solved, it just needs to be solved.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917
	936	05/12 01:54	ALTERNATI...		Typically I'd say ...Typically I'd say use the board alert feature when there is a flood or something unmanageable on the board. here are the things I said in the janitor channel most of you will probably not going to be promoted, but we are trying to improve your tools. Remember that the entire point of the janitor program is having people around to DELETE stuff, not pseudo-mod or be users with special privileges The only thing I can do now is let you know that the tools are being upgraded and I have started yelling at all the other mods to be in #janiteam all the time.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917
	934	05/11 23:08	Dhomochev...		Maybe the potentia...Maybe the potential for promoting some of us to mod status, but only on our own board might be an idea? Sort of a 'Janitor+' rank? We'd have more power to deal with situations such as these, but there'd be less chance of anything massively disasterous happening if anyone went on a powertrip.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917
	933	05/11 21:51	Dr. Stein		>>930 I've run int...>>930 I've run into the CP problem where I can't even get enough reports to make a ban request, which has lead me to some IRC shouting at times. I'll try to use the flag board tool the next time that this problem arises. As for janitors being promoted to mods: nah.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917
	932	05/11 20:17	geckoagua		>>930 I really do...>>930 I really don't even know the correct situation to use the board flag. Do I just pop it if some dick starts getting in a repost-delete war because I deleted his precious cock thread, or is it only when several people are invading? Because the former example is the one that gives the most problems. If that's what flag board is for when no mods respond in irc, great!	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917
	931	05/11 20:05	Foone		>>930 Like I said,...>>930 Like I said, this has apparently been "being worked on" since last December. I'm offering my coding services, because this needs to be done (if nothing else is going to be) I've never used the board alert system, I don't see what use it is intended for. Massive spamfloods from multiple people at once, maybe? I've never seen that happen. It doesn't seem to be any help for the problem I've mentioned: Banrequests work fine, they just are being ignored. I don't see how flagging a board is going to make mods that aren't online look at my ban requests. I'll start triggering all the highlights, then.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917
	930	05/11 19:39	ALTERNATI...		There's already a ...There's already a system being worked on to solve this very problem. also when is the last time you've used the board alert system? Any mod with the firefox extension should become aware of any alerts and act on them. Unfortunately mods can't be on all the time just as you can't be on all the time. Try setting off the highlights of the mods (I know you've done it before) or directly PMing someone. Saying "any mods around" doesn't presently grab anyones attention unless they're looking at the channel. A major problem is that not every mod is in #janiteam let alone on irc in general. We'll make more of an effort to be in the janitor channel.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917
	929	05/11 18:09	Foone		>>928 I suggested ...>>928 I suggested something like that on IRC a few days back. It's a good idea, but I think 15 is a bit high. More like 5, but do the timeline thing so they aren't at the same time. Ugh. I mean it has to go: Post-Delete-Post-Delete-Post-BAN, not Post-Post-Post-Post-Delete-Delete-BAN (So a janitor can't pick a thread full of one guy's posts and delete him for that, he has to be "fighting" the janitors)	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917
	928	05/11 17:56	Bachus		How about this? Wh...How about this? When a user has several of his posts (tracked by IP I would assume) deleted in a short period of time, said user is automatically temp banned for 5-10 minutes. Or after one ban request. Maybe not even banned from reading, just banned from posting. It would slow down floods which is the major problem for when no mods are available.	###.###.###.###
		Reply to thread
		917